Shareholding And Institutional Conviction: Who Is Buying Which
The latest June 2026 shareholding data shows foreign institutional ownership declining in both TCS and Infosys, although domestic institutions remain significant shareholders.
Shareholding Pattern
| TCS Mar 2026
| TCS June 2026
| Infosys Mar 2026
| Infosys June 2026
|
Promoters
| 71.77%
| 71.77%
| 14.38%
| 13.82%
|
FIIs
| 9.66%
| 9.07%
| 28.45%
| 27.09%
|
DIIs
| 13.33%
| 13.40%
| 43.13%
| 42.76%
|
Government
| 0.00%
| 0.00%
| 0.00%
| 0.00%
|
Public
| 5.24%
| 5.76%
| 14.04%
| 16.33%
|
(Source: TCS Annual Reports, Infosys Annual Reports, BSE, NSE, DSIJ)
In TCS, FII ownership declined by 59 basis points quarter on quarter, while DII holdings increased to 13.40%. Promoter ownership remained unchanged at 71.77%. Infosys recorded a larger reduction in FII holding, from 28.45% to 27.09%, alongside a modest decline in domestic institutional ownership.
The decline in Infosys promoter holdings should not be read entirely as promoter selling. During June, Shreyas Shibulal and Bhairavi Madhusudhan Shibulal were reclassified from the promoter group to the public category, which mechanically reduced the reported promoter percentage.
Institutional ownership data does not point to a single conclusion in the TCS vs Infosys comparison. TCS shows a smaller change in domestic institutional ownership over the period.
TCS vs Infosys: Comparison Across 10 Parameters
A comparison relevant to IT services companies covers revenue growth, margins, deal wins, client relationships, employee metrics and emerging technology revenues.
Key Metrics
Metric
| TCS
| Infosys
|
Q2 FY27 revenue
| ₹73,188 crore
| ₹49,244 crore
|
Q2 FY27 YoY CC growth
| 2.8%
| 1.5%
|
FY26 CC revenue growth
| 11.2% decline
| 10.7%
|
Q2 FY27 operating margin
| 24.00%
| 21.00%
|
FY26 large deal TCV
| $9.6 billion
| $5.2 billion
|
FY27 revenue growth guidance
| _
| 1%–2% in constant-currency terms
|
AI Revenue Indicator
| $3.1 billion annualised AI revenue
| AI contributed 10.5% of quarterly revenue
|
Net profit
| ₹13,884 crore
| ₹7,823 crore
|
Net profit growth YoY
| 14.9%
| 6.2%
|
FY27 operating margin guidance
| _
| 20%–22%
|
TCS and Infosys reported different strengths in Q2 FY27, with TCS maintaining higher operating margins and recording larger deal wins, while Infosys continued to report year-on-year revenue growth amid a cautious demand environment.
TCS reported revenue of ₹73,188 crore, up 11.2% year-on-year, while net profit increased 14.9% to ₹13,884 crore. Its operating margin stood at 24%. The company recorded a large-deal total contract value (TCV) of $9.6 billion, equivalent to approximately ₹86,400 crore at an illustrative exchange rate of ₹90 per dollar. Annualised AI revenue reached $3.1 billion, crossing 10% of total revenue. Growth during the quarter was supported by banking and financial services, manufacturing, and technology and services.
Infosys reported revenue of ₹49,244 crore, an increase of 10.7% year-on-year, while net profit attributable to shareholders rose approximately 6.2% to ₹7,823 crore. Its operating margin remained stable at 21%. The company secured $5.2 billion in large-deal TCV, of which 62% was classified as net-new business. AI contributed 10.5% of quarterly revenue, with AI revenue growing 29% sequentially.
Looking ahead, Infosys revised its FY27 constant-currency revenue growth guidance to 1%–2%, while retaining its operating margin guidance of 20%–22%. TCS's results highlighted continued deal activity and AI-related demand, although constant-currency revenue growth remained modest. Overall, TCS reported higher profitability and larger deal wins, while Infosys continued to expand its AI business. Future performance at both companies will depend on deal execution, client spending and the pace of enterprise technology investment.
TCS vs Infosys Over a 3-Year Horizon: Data Points to Consider
For investors comparing TCS and Infosys over a longer horizon, the data separates into two categories: metrics related to earnings visibility and scale and metrics related to growth rate and valuation multiples.
TCS reported higher figures on execution metrics, margins and client relationship metrics referenced above. It entered FY27 with a quarterly order book of $9.5 billion and annualised AI revenue of $2.6 billion for Q1 FY27. A leadership transition at TCS during this period is a factor relevant to future growth trends and client engagement.
Q2 FY27 results provide an updated view of demand and business momentum at both companies. TCS reported a large-deal total contract value of $9.6 billion and annualised AI revenue of $3.1 billion during the quarter. Infosys recorded $5.2 billion in large-deal wins, with 62% classified as net-new business, while AI contributed 10.5% of its quarterly revenue. Infosys also revised its FY27 constant-currency revenue growth guidance to 1%–2%, while retaining its operating margin guidance of 20%–22%. TCS reported an operating margin of 24% for the quarter. These indicators offer a basis for assessing deal momentum, AI adoption and profitability, although future performance will depend on execution and client spending.