People who trade at the stock market look for patterns (trends) by examining past prices, price changes and news, and hope to find something that will give them insight into what will occur next. The Random Walk Theory challenges this approach to investing.
According to the theory, price movement is no different from an unexpected event. If a large volume of stock is traded, a price change occurs, and no one knows why the change happened or didn't happen.
If this theory is true, yesterday's chart provides no guarantee of obtaining the same results in the future. Thus, the upward price movement is not necessarily a reliable indicator of future price movement.
In this way, markets change from being a puzzle to being "an event". It is possible to observe the changes in the market, but it is difficult to predict those changes with certainty.
Historical Background and Origin
Random walk theory may sound modern, but its roots go back over a century. In 1863, Jules Regnault, a French mathematician and stockbroker, wrote about chance and the stock market. His ideas started the link between maths and markets.
Later, Louis Bachelier expanded on these ideas. In 1900, he published the "Theory of Speculation," one of the first to use statistics in finance. His work shaped how people study price behaviour.
In 1964, Paul Cootner published The Random Character of Stock Market Prices, building on this thinking. Then came Burton Malkiel’s famous book in 1973. Together, these works helped shape how we understand market movements today under the random walk theory.
Key Principles of Random Walk Theory
Random walk theory is built on two main assumptions: first, that stock prices move randomly without following any pattern; and second, that markets are efficient, meaning all known information is already reflected in prices. Because of this, predicting future price changes using past data or analysis becomes extremely difficult.
Random Price Movement
Each price change is treated as a separate event, like flipping a coin. Just because a stock rose today doesn’t mean it will continue tomorrow. The theory says past price behaviour gives no clue about future movements.
Independence of Securities
The movement of one stock doesn’t influence another unless both are affected by the same news. According to the theory, stock prices mostly move on their own, based on their specific data or events.
Market Efficiency
The theory assumes that all available information is already priced in. So, when news comes out, the market adjusts instantly. This makes it hard to gain an advantage by using public data or analysis methods.
Unpredictability of New Information
No one can know future news in advance. Since prices react to news, and news itself is unpredictable, price changes must also be unpredictable. That’s why the theory argues that timing the market is nearly impossible.
Additional Read: What is Chaos Theory
Implications for Investors
- The implications of Random Walk Theory may be cumbersome for some investors, as it takes away the idea that studying past market data will always allow for greater intelligence to inform future buying and selling decisions.
- The implication of Random Walk Theory is that every single new price will be independent of the price fluctuations of the past. The basis of most technical analysis relies heavily on chart patterns and/or past price action to provide a level of comfort for the investor.
- This feature is also part of what is covered by Random Walk Theory, in that, when the next price movement occurs, it may be for a reason that is unknown and will not be able to be tracked by any chart.
Criticisms and Limitations of the Theory
Too Simple for Real Markets
The random walk theory assumes that markets behave in a simple, predictable way. But real markets are more complex. Prices can react to news, but also to policy changes, interest rates, and events like insider trading.
Disagrees with Technical Analysis
Many traders believe price charts reveal trends and patterns. These traders use technical analysis to make decisions. They don’t agree with the idea that past prices have no role in predicting future prices.
Can’t Explain Long-Term Success
Some investors, like Warren Buffett, have consistently outperformed the market. Their success raises questions about the theory. If markets were truly random, how could anyone beat them over many years?
Assumes Everyone Has the Same Data
The theory says all investors work with the same information. But in reality, big institutions often get better and faster data. This creates gaps that the theory doesn’t account for.
Doesn’t Reflect Sudden Market Moves
Mathematician Benoit Mandelbrot said markets don’t always move in smooth patterns. Prices can change in extreme ways. He suggested using models that include these sudden, large moves and long-term risks.
Additional Read: What is Efficient Market Hypothesis
Random Walk Theory vs. Technical and Fundamental Analysis
Feature
| Random Walk Theory
| Technical/Fundamental Analysis
|
Core Belief
| Prices move randomly
| Prices follow trends or reflect company data
|
View on Predictability
| Unpredictable; past data has no value
| Predictable through charts or financial reports
|
Investment Strategy Impact
| Favors passive, long-term investing
| Supports active trading and timing
|
Price Movement Reasoning
| Driven by new, random information
| Influenced by past trends or financial signals
.
|